Change Allocations On A .2% Move?

 | Sep 03, 2015 01:15PM ET

Can you believe that its a really big deal to some if an index is down 9.9% from it highs (non-correction territory) or if its down 10.1% (correction territory)? Does .2% dictate that we make a different allocation decision? Are you kidding me?

Do you find yourself agreeing more with the person on the left or right? I'm in the camp with Lou on the right. Should we make investment decisions based upon a term (correction)? Not me.