Gold And Silver: Now's The Time To Buy The Dip
Erik Swarts | Oct 06, 2016 12:24AM ET
As trading in the fourth quarter got underway this week, the bottom quickly fell out in precious metals, with gold and silver each finishing down in Tuesday’s session by more than 3 and 5 percent, respectively. When the dust settled, both assets had completely retraced the moves since the June 23rd Brexit vote roiled global markets.
While gold and silver had largely remained range-bound for the better part of the third quarter, lower support gave way as traders threw their gilded babies out with the bathwater as the tape was hit Tuesday morning with the hopes, fears and hype of higher rates.
The Hopes: as witnessed in the relief from the growing desperation in Europe that has seen European bank shares fall sharply with negative yields this year, led by Germany’s embattled Deutsche Bank (NYSE:DB), who’s market value has roughly been cut in half since January.
Stoking hope, was a report out of Bloomberg (here ) Tuesday morning citing confidential ECB officials, that an “informal consensus has built among policy makers in the past month that asset buying will have to be tapered once a decision is taken to end the program.” And although they “didn’t exclude that QE could still be extended past the current end-date of March 2017 at the full pace of 80 billion euros a month”, the report elicited a taper-tantrumesque reaction in the government bond markets – as well as bank shares, with yields and bank stocks rising on both sides of the Atlantic.
The Fears: as in David Byrne’s, “My god what have we done?!” realization, that although low yields were welcomed by central banks to prop-up economic growth and stave off potential deflation, they’re not so good for bank profits and defined pension plans over the long run, as it inherently squeezes profitability and hence could eventually put the broader financial system at risk through substantially weaker banks.
Although fear of inflation was the tack he chose, Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker’s closing remarks from his speech early Tuesday morning (here ) made the favorable policy parallel to the Fed’s severe actions in 1994 that doubled the Fed funds rate from 3 to 6 percent over just one year. Notwithstanding the apparent absurdity of the comparison with today’s economic backdrop, the speech set the tone for the morning session and correlated with the sharp range break lower in precious metals and bid in the US dollar.
The Hype: Simply put, you know there’s serious confusion and divide within the Fed, and hence the market, when a Fed president cites 1994 as a model policy blueprint and gives Greenspan credit for the preemptive action that “laid the foundation for the price stability we’ve enjoyed over the last 20-plus years”.
Get The News You Want
Ignoring the massive market dislocation that rolled the dice of systemic risk and took down, among other investors – Orange County California, someone should remind Lacker that Greenspan’s aggressive preemption in 1994 also inverted the yield curve and took US economic growth from 5.6 percent per year to just 1.4 percent—in just three quarters.
If it wasn’t for luck and the nascent technology boom that was just getting started, his actions would have undoubtedly precipitated a deep recession and an immediate unwinding of tighter monetary policy, which would have destroyed the Fed's credibility in the market going forward. And although the Fed at that time had room to drive rates on both sides of the road, with US economic growth currently at 1.4 percent, the inevitable and likely severe contraction brought on by a similar tightening regime would find the Fed out of road overnight and back to more unconventional policy measures that have already lost considerable efficacy and support within the market.
The Opportunity: With the range break lower this week, gold and silver are now trading back to levels from late June in another market environment significantly discounting the impact of higher rates. While a modest 25 basis point hike is not out of the question this December—and one we suspect is now being fully priced into the sector, it has paid to buy the dip in precious metals over the past year, as market participants become over zealous on the prospect of higher rates and ignore the real motivation of a weaker dollar and lower real yields.
The reality is that these misplaced expectations are eventually walked back, as market forces and the economic data largely prevent the Fed from enacting more conventional tightening regimes, let alone a severe outlier period like 1994. From our perspective, it would behoove Lacker to follow the median trend of the Fed's own dot-plot projections, that despite moving in the right direction over the past year, still have considerable room to fall in line with more realistic expectations within the long-term yield cycle.
As we've described in previous notes, this expectation gap ties directly into the performance of the US dollar that peaked with the Fed's dot-plot projections last year, and which we strongly suspect will again be hit on the downside with the realization that this isn't Kansas—or 1994 anymore.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.