Boeing-Airbus WTO Battle Rumbles On As Tensions Rise Between U.S., E.U.
MetalMiner | Oct 07, 2019 04:10AM ET
For once, President Donald Trump should be pleased with the World Trade Organization (WTO), a body he has repeatedly criticized and actively worked to undermine by preventing the appointment of new judges to its appeals panel.
On Oct. 2, the WTO ruled in the U.S.’s favor, agreeing to the largest tariff penalty in its history. The case is the long-running dispute between the U.S. and the E.U. over supposed illegal subsidies provided by both governments to its major plane manufacturers.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
The standoff started in 2004 when the U.S. brought action against the E.U. for cheap loans afforded to Airbus Group SE (PA:AIR). The E.U. promptly countered, saying the U.S. gave subsidies and extensive military contracts to Boeing (NYSE:BA) that effectively provided the same (or similar) support.
Get The News You Want
The reality is aircraft design and development is such a risky long-haul venture that no one would do it without some level of state support.
Get The News You Want
The U.S. has done it over decades. Various European governments — and the E.U. as a whole — have too, as have the Japanese and, now, the Chinese.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
Whether the subsidies granted to Boeing and Airbus are more than legally appropriate will continue to be a source of revenue for expensive lawyers for years to come.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
The WTO is due to rule in eight months’ time on whether U.S. subsidies to Boeing are lawful; the sense seems to be the WTO will rule they were not and, as such, we will be back to square one.
Get The News You Want
According to the Financial Times, the WTO authorized the U.S. to levy tariffs of up to 100% on $7.5 billion of the $11 billion the U.S. had originally applied to penalize. To the U.S.’s credit, the decision initially is to levy tariffs of 10% on aircraft and 25% on a diverse range of other products, as the below chart from the Financial Times illustrates — perhaps meant to encourage dialogue.
Get The News You Want
While a lot of hot air is blowing around, it would seem neither side wants a full-blown trade war over this issue.
Get The News You Want
Aircraft parts have been exempted from any immediate tariffs, said by the Financial Times to be in a reprieve for Airbus’ manufacturing plant in Alabama. Airbus, on the other hand, has cautioned that 40% of its aircraft-related procurement comes from U.S. suppliers, supporting some 275,000 American jobs in 40 states — any escalation will have a direct hit on the U.S. aircraft supply chain.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
U.S. carriers share prices have taken a hit as concerns were raised that Boeing would not be able to meet demand and U.S. carriers would be forced to simply pay more for Airbus aircraft.
Get The News You Want
As such, one can see what a blunt instrument tariffs are; the ripple of unintended consequences spreads like a rock dropped in a lake, never mind a pebble in a pond.
Get The News You Want
Unless the U.S. announces a stay of execution, the E.U. can expect the imposition of tariffs on Oct. 18, with the biggest impact falling on the approximately $5.1 billion worth of aircraft imported in 2018; however, according to the Economist, only a portion of this total will be hit.
Get The News You Want
Get The News You Want
In the meantime, both sides are awaiting the WTO’s ruling on the case against the U.S. providing subsidies to Boeing.
Get The News You Want
As such, any resolution before May next year is unlikely. The aviation industry on both sides of the Atlantic can expect disruption and cost increases.
Get The News You Want
Whatever tariff supporters may suggest, there are rarely winners in tariff wars — only varying degrees of losers.
Get The News You Want
by Stuart Burns
Get The News You Want
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.