Anatomy Of A Bear Market And What To Expect This Earnings Season
Ivana Delevska | Oct 27, 2022 07:00AM ET
- Most companies are reporting weak earnings but expectations are very low
- Where are the risks and opportunities?
- Earnings offer glimpse into macro trends
- Semis/hardware, inventory dynamics are significantly exacerbating a difficult macro backdrop. As an example AMD warned that PC demand will be $1bn lower revenue on a base of $6.7bn. PCs are ~33% of AMD's total revenue, which would imply that company expects that chips sold to PCs will be down 50%+ yoy while the PC market was down mid-teens during the quarter. This means that even if the market continues to decline, semiconductor earnings will form a floor as inventory destocking comes to an end (usually takes 2 quarters).
- Economically sensitive SaaS especially ones exposed to small businesses are facing significant cyclical headwinds. Microsoft noted on its earnings call that small and medium enterprises were disproportionately weak. But ultimately, even in an economic scenario of muted growth, companies will have to invest to run their businesses more efficiently through a downturn, which will create a tailwind for these companies even in a weaker macro.
- Consumption based software. We expect that spending on cloud infrastructure will be relatively more resilient through a downturn. But there are two trends to note (1) cloud spending is now a major expense item and most companies will look to optimize it (2) consumption based business models are likely to experience slower growth. This means that there will be an initial re-set before companies can resume strong secular growth. Snowflake (NYSE:SNOW) flagged this trend as early as March of this year, and it was followed by muted guides from MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) and Datadog (NASDAQ:DDOG). But some investors are still surprised by the slower growth reported by the hyperscalers (e.g. Microsoft just guided to 37% growth for Azure for 2Q23 vs. 42% in 1Q23 and 39% consensus - solid, but a deceleration).
- Traditional SaaS for specific applications such as cybersecurity, design, and simulation we expect to be most resilient. Although we expect some level of uncertainty with deals taking longer to close, spending in these categories is generally non-discretionary.
- We expect more downside for areas such as advertising, where weak macro trends are exacerbated by privacy policy changes.
- We expect potential downside for companies directly exposed to deteriorating consumer balance sheets driven by higher interest rates. Within technology we are avoiding areas where companies are taking asset and credit risks. In cyclicals we are avoiding housing, autos, and other "big ticket" items.
- Microsoft: in-line 1Q23 but weak guidance for 2Q23. Specifically, Azure growth to slow to +37% yoy in F2Q23 from 42% in F1Q23 (-5pts qoq). While lower than expectations, we view anything above 30%+ growth as solid in this environment.
- Google: miss on top and bottom line (-3% revenue/-7% EBITDA miss). Revenue was up 6% (11% ex FX). Add spend weak driven by Youtube and Network, while cloud showed good momentum. Cloud growth accelerated to +38% yoy in 3Q22 (+180bp), although on an easy comp.
- Snap: in addition to weak macro, biggest challenge was customer engagement. Time spent watching content in the U.S. declined 5% yoy. Guide for flat revenue in 4Q implies declines in November and December.
- AMD: weak PCs drove $1bn revenue shortfall, but investors now worried if enterprise spend is the next shoe to drop.
- Carmax: same store sales down -8.3% and disappointing CAF income driven by weak consumer demand and higher than anticipated loan loss provisions. Interest rate driven affordability pressures.
- Unlike prior downturns, where the Fed came to the rescue, monetary tightening is the principal driver of this downturn. Consequently, the Fed's decisions are well telegraphed and bad news gets priced in consistently ahead of the announcements and results (e.g., the VIX, a volatility index we closely watch, has been relatively contained)
- In a typical downturn, there is overcapacity in the system and small changes in demand result in earnings collapse. This is than followed by a sharp recovery as supply and demand comes to balance. In this bear market, there is no broad overcapacity, but many dislocations. While some are getting corrected (e.g., semis) others are getting created (e.g., housing). Consequently, on the positive side we don't expect a sudden collapse in earnings across the board, but on the negative side we expect prolonged headwinds that will ultimately affect earnings in many end markets
- There are significant differences between this technology bear market and the tech bubble of 2000. Many tech companies today have proven business models at scale and generate significant cash flow. While correlations have been high and all technology has been treated equally thus far in the sell off, we are starting to note divergence between good and bad companies.
- Snowflake job openings showed consistent growth.
- DataDog employment growth peaked in 2021 and flattened out in 2022.
Tech giants Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL) just kicked off the earnings season, after several notable reports and pre-announcements from Snap (NYSE:SNAP), Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD), Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) and CarMax (NYSE:KMX).
Demand trends have significantly deteriorated since last quarter and ultimately we expect that every sector will be impacted by the sluggish macro.
With this set up in mind, there are many companies that look very attractive on pullbacks, as we expect that secular trends will overcome their cyclical headwinds over the next several quarters. Within industrial/enterprise technology there is a wide spectrum of business models all providing different risk/reward. On one end of the spectrum are semis/hardware with the most downside, but also the most upside in a recovery, and on the other end of the spectrum are software (SaaS) business models which we expect to be most resilient through the downturn.
Get The News You Want
Overall, while many risks reman, the share prices of most of the companies in the four categories above have declined 50-80% ytd, presenting what we believe to be attractive opportunities, and manageable risks.
On the contrary, there are many areas where we believe the risks outweigh the potential upside.
Reported earnings are continuing to surprise to the downside, despite expectations declining throughout the quarter. While last quarter we experienced several pockets of weakness (transportation, PCs, semis) this weakness has now broadened to large cap technology companies, that can be viewed as a proxy for the broader economy.
On the positive side, expectations are now re-set significantly lower especially in areas such as cloud (re-set with Microsoft earnings), semiconductors (re-set with AMD and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)), transportation and logistics (re-set with FedEx (NYSE:FDX)) etc. Consequently, we expect more positive than negative earnings surprises, despite that the earnings cuts trend for the broader market still remains in tact.
h2 Macro Backdrop/h2While downturns follow a pattern, each one is slightly different and caused by a different catalyst.
High risks assets generally sell-off first, which was the case in this downturn, with limited differentiation within business models. This phase is followed by a broad valuation reset, in this case pretty violent and exacerbated by higher discount rates; and lastly, earnings estimates get cut driven by broad macro weakness.
While the last phase is generally the most violent and volatile, there are several factors that differentiate this downturn from others:
We believe that industrial technology can do very well in this scenario once the market stabilizes. Our channel checks indicate that while most companies are looking to optimize their spend, which is weighing on earnings and creating elongated deal cycles, investing in technology will be the only way for companies to stay competitive. We therefore expect a very meaningful tech cycle ahead.
h2 Divergence in Fundamentals/h2While in the first two phases of the downturn there was limited differentiation between companies with solid vs. poor fundamentals, we are just starting to notice some divergence.
As an interesting datapoint, we compare stock price performance of Snowflake and DataDog, both leaders in cloud infrastructure, with Zillow (NASDAQ:Z), an online real estate platform. While these businesses have seemingly not much to do with each other, all three companies have declined roughly the same amount (~50% ytd).
Now turning on to the fundamentals, we compare hiring data provided by Revealera, a company focused on hiring insights in technology. Job openings for both DataDog and Snowflake show a similar, but more recently a slightly diverging trend.
Conversely, job openings for Zillow show a clear deterioration, implying significant divergence in fundamentals. This divergence in fundamentals did not impact the stocks in 1H22, as the sell of was driven by interest rates and consequently valuations, rather than fundamentals.
Interestingly, while fundamentals did not have a meaningful impact on stock prices in the first half of 2022, this changed since the June lows. Many companies traded down to historically low valuations and found a floor, while others with deteriorating earnings fundamentals continue to find new lows.
We noted similar trend for cybersecurity companies, which have continued on a path of consistent growth in hiring. Many of those companies did not reach new lows despite the recent leg down for the market.
Disclosures: Views expressed here are for informational purposes only and are not investment recommendations. SPEAR may, but does not necessarily have investments in the companies mentioned. For a list of holdings click Click here for our Privacy Policy.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.