A Stock Market Divergence Made For Bears, Bulls, And Volatile Narratives
Dr. Duru | Jun 21, 2018 05:23AM ET
- AT40 = 65.8% of stocks are trading above their respective 40-day moving averages (DMAs)
- AT200 = 55.5% of stocks are trading above their respective 200DMAs (a 4-month high)
- VIX = 12.8
- Short-term Trading Call: Bearish
Commentary
The stock market is oozing with divergences as a result of global trade wars, especially the escalating spat between the US and China. One part of the market is too connected to China to move higher. Some stocks like Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) and a whole basket of commodity-related plays are falling hard as investors brace for a weaker Chinese economy.
Caterpillar (CAT) gapped down below its 200DMA and confirmed the breakdown with today’s loss. CAT last traded below its 200DMA over two years ago.
BHP Billiton (NYSE:BHP) confirmed a double-top with a 50DMA breakdown. The lower Bollinger® Bands (BBs) are turning downward and further confirming a bearish turn of events.
The price of iron ore is running out of gas again. The highs from earlier in the year look even more out of reach as a triple top seems near confirmation.
Source: Business Insider
(Per my strategy, I faded Monday’s comeback in BHP and turned right around and took profits on Tuesday’s subsequent gap down. I only WISH I had stayed consistent in holding puts on CAT!).
Another segment of the market could not care less about macro-economic calamities and is collectively racing higher in what looks like an effective “safety” trade. Today, it was clear tech stocks and smaller US domestic stocks are the anointed safety plays. The NASDAQ and the iShares Russell 2000 (NYSE:IWM) summarized this statement quite nicely by gapping up today to new all-time highs.
Get The News You Want
The NASDAQ gapped up and powered to another all-time high. The move instantly wiped away several days of sagging performance.
The Invesco QQQ Trust ETF (NASDAQ:QQQ) gapped up like the NASDAQ but failed to punch out a new all-time high. Apple has been a significant drag on the QQQ.
As expected, the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) broke out yet again this week to fresh all-time highs.
The SPDR S&P 500 (NYSE:SPY) is caught in the middle. The index that I use to form my short-term trading gapped up to end a streak of three straight losing days. On each of those days, buyers took the index sharply off its lows. Yet, the S&P 500 is caught in an important struggle with its March peak. Until it can push past this line of resistance, I will keep my short-term trading call at bearish. Accordingly, I have accumulated SPY put options expiring next Friday.
The S&P 500 (SPY) is suffering yet another post-Fed hangover as it struggles to overcome critical resistance from March’s high.
AT40 (T2108), the percentage of stocks trading above their respective 40-day moving averages (DMAs), continues to confirm my bearish stance by trading below the 70% overbought threshold after having fallen from overbought conditions last week. Today AT40 closed at 65.8%. I find it quite telling that tech and small caps have been unable to lift my favorite technical indicator back into a bullish position above 70%.
Finally, there is the volatility index, the VIX. The VIX soared on Tuesday as much as 19.3%. I resisted the urge to close out my call options on ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures (NYSE:UVXY) for a minimal loss: I am holding them for their hedge value. As long as I am in short-term bearish mode, I will keep rolling into fresh tranches. Just as I suspected, the VIX faders went right to work. Today, those faders closed what little remained of Tuesday’s gap up.
The volatility index, the VIX, is still unable to keep its head above water. Yet, the 12 level is still hold as approximate support.
This mix of bearish and bullish trading action makes the market overall look manic and fickle. Underneath it all is a method to the madness. So if you are bearish, like me right now, you focus on the trade-impacted parts of the market. If you are bullish, a significant swath of the market is giving you permission to completely ignore the chaos closing in on financial markets. I choose my words purposely. The sentimental logic of a divergent market includes an impenetrable wall where bears and bulls safely play separate from each other. I believe that at some point, the Trump administration’s focused determination to drive the US trade balance toward zero will cause enough economic disruption to cascade out into the broader economy. I am hoping to be properly positioned whenever the market fully processes that reality.
Mad Money’s Jim Cramer, the master at creating market narratives, provides a great case study on the divided mood of the market and on the mental challenges of sorting through the true market risks of a trade war with China. From Friday to Tuesday, Jim Cramer flipped from caution, to derision, and back to caution when trying to help his audience sort through the trade-impacted market. Cramer has one mind to warn his audience of the risks. His skepticism over the eventual impact of a trade war encourages him to tell the audience to press on buying dips in trade-impacted plays and catching the uptrends elsewhere in the market.
On Friday, June 15th, Cramer recommended that his audience “curb its enthusiasm” over the stock market because of the sentiment-killing impact of the trade war. He went so far as to call the whole episode a “debacle” that means being slower to pounce on dibs and curbing enthusiasm over rallies.
CNBC .
And, perhaps just as feared, the stock market opened the week with a small gap down on the heels of more bad trade headlines. Even though the much of the trading action seemed to validate Cramer’s apparent caution on Friday, Cramer chose to scoff at the entire notion that the US and China are even engaged in a trade war. For emphasis, he even sarcastically came up with an idea for a new ETF: GLUM. He started off his show by declaring “Don’t be gloomy! You see, every day the sense of gloom seems to become more palpable.” I would not blame you for experiencing some mental disconnect from this observation on a day when the markets closed on the heels of a comeback with the S&P 500 only losing 0.2% and the NASDAQ closing flat. This is the stuff of divergence.
CNBC .
Here are some other choice quotes I pulled from the show (emphasis mine):
“I don’t want to dismiss the worries about tariffs or rising rates; that would be foolish. But at some point we have to remember we have a blazing hot economy here. And yet the negativity is so encompassing…I would create a GLOOM index…
It’s out of control people…People are afraid that Trump has WRECKED the world economy…
So here’s the bottom-line: GLUM’s the word. It is all pervasive as investors freak out about President Trump’s tough trade policies. That’s why we gotta have this ETF…Trump got you down? You know what I’m saying? GLUM!
As for me though, I think these stocks are buys into weakness…the negativity has gotten completely out of hand….I think these stocks are buys on any weakness…
So stick with GLUM if you think Trump is WRECKING world trade.”
Recall that it was just one trading day ago when investors were instructed to be SLOW to buy the dips.
Cramer even challenged his viewers to find a SINGLE business that was impacted. At the end of the show: “Yes, I thought things are too gloomy. I am surprised to see the gloom lifted around 3 o’clock. But do not forget that the gloomsters will be back tomorrow with endless articles about how the economy is being wrecked by the Trump tariffs. Find me a CEO who agrees! OK? Find me one.”
Given CEOs are eternal optimists, we would of course be hard-pressed to find a leader of a company gloomy enough to wail about an economic calamity at this juncture. However, we CAN find plenty of CEOs complaining about the impact of the trade war on their businesses. Marketplace has done an excellent job of featuring real-life losers and winners from the trade war.
Shortly after that show aired, President Trump officially escalated the trade war by threatening tariffs on an additional $200B of Chinese imports. China quickly retaliated this time. Global financial markets took dives with the currency markets once again confirming the negative impact of the trade warring.
US indices opened lower in sympathy with global angst. Yet, buyers once again lifted the major indices off their lows of the day. This time, the NASDAQ was not able to avoid a losing day. Cramer opened his show with a classic line that his audience should keep bookmarked, especially since Cramer tells us he kept this conclusion ready on the shelf:
“Do not say I didn’t warn you. I’ve been telling you for months that President Trump wants this trade war with China. And the stock market will not like it. It will be the principal risk to 2018’s returns.”
So is it OK to be cautious and curb our enthusiasm now? Or should we still be buying every trade-related dip? I think the answer is “it depends…” Cramer went on to lay out the case for the path to victory for the US in its trade war with China including a list of casualties and survivors. (Yes, Cramer’s list of casualties overlapped with the GLUM index he created just the day before). Here are some choice quotes:
“China needs us more than we need them…BUT stocks could go down anyway…Here’s the bottom-line: I think we may find out that China is the paper tiger…It’s possible that this may go on for a long time and get very painful. But I wouldn’t be surprised if China ends up folding much faster than anyone expects. Still you need to take some real pain, particularly in so-called China stocks before you can get a potentially bountiful gain.”
I think this assessment covers a full circle of possibilities!
Cramer even went so far as to dare China to sell its holdings of US Treasury bills as part of its retaliation plan.
CNBC .
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.