Christine Short | Sep 02, 2021 01:02AM ET
During the Q2 earnings season, we profiled 10 companies that had unusual or revised earnings dates which can serve as a foreshadowing of what an upcoming report might reveal, and therefore be an indicator of financial health. Seventy-percent of those companies' stocks reacted as we expected, using the Wall Street Horizon DateBreaks Factor logic.¹
Below we review all 10 names and how they performed in the three days following their announcement.
h2 1. ConAgra Foods/h2We flagged ConAgra Foods (NYSE:CAG) ahead of their Fiscal Q4 (Calendar Q2) report because they confirmed an unusual earnings date, outside of the historical date range in which we’ve typically seen them report. CAG tends to release CQ2 results between June 21 - 30, and have done so since 2006. However, this year they confirmed they would be announcing 2 weeks later on July 13. According to academic research, a later than usual earnings date often indicates bad news will be announced.
h3 Results:/h3Despite beating EPS (actual: $0.54, est: $0.52) and revenue expectations (actual: $2.740B, est: $2.712B), Conagra trimmed their guidance for FY 2022.² While they expect demand to remain high for their products, inflation is impacting their bottom-line. They now expect organic net sales to be flat YoY and EPS of $2.50, vs. previous guidance of $2.63 - $2.73.
Of course we know investors care more about forward looking guidance than past performance, and as expected the stock started to drift lower. This resulted in a price decrease of $2.14 or -5.9%.³
Rexnord Corporation (NYSE:RXN) crossed our radar ahead of their FQ1 2022 report with a confirmed earnings date that was outside of their historical range. RXN has reported CQ2 results between July 28 - August 6 for the last 7 years. However, this quarter they confirmed they would be announcing 2 weeks earlier than our projected date of Aug. 3. The drastic advancement of the earnings date indicated a positive report ahead.
h3 Results:/h3Rexnord reported Q2 results that surpassed expectations on both the top (actual: $568.30M, est: $543.50M) and bottom-line (actual: $0.58, est: $0.50).² This resulted in a price rise of $4.44 or +9.2%.³
Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) also had a report date that was earlier than their historical average. MMC typically reports Q2 results between July 26 - August 7, and has done so since 2006. On June 24 the company issued a press release stating that Q2 results would be released on July 22, a week earlier than we had estimated. As such we anticipated better-than-expected results on earnings day.
h3 Results:/h3Marsh & McLennan easily surpassed Wall Street estimates for both EPS (actual: $1.75, est: $1.43), and revenues (actual: $5.017B, est: $4.515B).² Satisfied investors took the stock up $8.60 or +6.2% in the 3-day post-earnings period.³
We don’t often see mega-cap companies reporting outside of their historical earnings date range, which is why all the alarms went off when we noticed Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) had confirmed they were reporting a week later than usual. MSFT typically releases their FQ4 results between July 17 - 23, and have done so since 2007.
Microsoft usually pre-announces two weeks before its earnings date, so we had clues that they were reporting late. Indeed on July 13, the company announced it would post results on the afternoon of July 27—a week later than first estimated.
h3 Results/h3Despite putting up stellar results for the second quarter, beating on EPS (actual: $2.17, est: $1.92), and revenues (actual: $46.152B, est: $44.221B), a slowing top-line growth forecast and issues with chip shortages were not well received by traders.² This resulted in a price drop of $4.76 or -1.6%.³
We weren’t surprised to see Vista Outdoor (NYSE:VSTO) pull their earnings date forward last quarter as leisure and recreation names have been on an impressive run. Since their IPO in 2015, VSTO has always reported FQ1 results any time from August 6 - 13, always on a Thursday. On July 8 the company issued a press release stating that FQ1 results would be released on July 29 this year.
h3 Results/h3Sure enough, the company beat the sell-side’s profit (actual: $1.74, est: $0.90) and sales expectations (actual: $662.91M, est: $613.78M).² Investors went on to reward Vista Outdoor’s stock, bringing it up $5.03 or +13% in the 3-day post earnings period.³
BP (NYSE:BP) is one of two companies in this bunch that actually revised their originally confirmed earnings date. BP initially confirmed a Q2 report date of July 27, subsequently changing it to Aug. 3, usually a sign that bad news is ahead.
h3 Results:/h3BP reported they handily beat on the bottom-line (actual: $0.83, est: $0.61) but missed expectations on the top-line (actual: $36.47B, est: $40.70B).² They also announced they were expanding their dividend and share buyback program, a boon for investors. This resulted in a price increase of $1.61 or +6.7%.³
Upon further investigation it appears BP also revised their earnings date in Q2 2020, from July 28 to Aug. 4. This occurred just after new CFO Murray Auchincloss assumed the post, which could explain the moving dates. We often notice that changes in management affects earnings dates.
We flagged Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (NASDAQ:GT) ahead of their Q2 report because they confirmed an unusual earnings date, outside of the historical date range which we’ve typically seen them report. GT usually releases Q2 results between July 26 - 31, and have done so since 2007, always on a Friday. In 2005 and 2006, however, they did report on Aug. 4. This year they announced plans to release results on Aug. 6, a week later than their 14-year trend.
h3 Results:/h3Goodyear Tire reported EPS that was double analyst expectations (actual: $0.32, est: $0.16), and easily beat revenue estimates as well (actual: $3.988B, est: $3.735B).² This resulted in a price increase of $1.93 or +12.9%.³
Air Products and Chemicals (NYSE:APD) got our attention when they confirmed a FQ3 earnings date that was two weeks outside of their historical range. APD has reported CQ2 results between July 22 - Aug. 1 for the last 15 years. However, this quarter they confirmed they would be announcing 2 weeks later than our projected date of July 29. This would also be the first time they reported on a Monday, another unusual move.
h3 Results:/h3When Air Products & Chemicals reported, they missed on EPS (actual: $2.31, est: $2.36) and beat on revenues (actual: $2.605B, est: $2.498B).² This resulted in a price drop of $15.07 or -5.2%.³
This is eBay's (NASDAQ:EBAY) second consecutive Q2 reporting drastically outside of their historical range. In Q2 2020 the company shifted reporting from the third week of July into the last week of the month, likely attributable to COVID-19 lockdowns and the ensuing uncertainty.
This year we estimated EBAY would announce on July 27. They later confirmed an unusually late date of Aug. 11, the first time they have reported Q2 results in August since we started tracking this name in 2006. Typically we would assume this meant bad news would be shared in the upcoming announcement. However, we were aware that another possible reason for this could be due to recent management changes.
In May, eBay issued a press release stating it would bring on a new CFO. Scott Priest, formerly CFO of Jetblue, officially took his new post on June 21.
h3 Results:/h3eBay reported on Aug. 11 and beat Wall Street’s EPS (actual: $0.99, est: $0.96) and revenue estimates (actual: $2.668B, est: $2.626B).² This resulted in a price increase of $9.90 or +15.1%.³
Like BP, Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) also revised their earnings date for the second quarter. ULTA initially confirmed their earnings date for Thursday, Aug. 26, later changing it to a day earlier, Wednesday Aug. 25. This didn’t trigger a significant Z-score on our end, but nonetheless piqued our interest as it’s somewhat uncommon for high profile companies to change their earnings date once confirmed. Regardless, we took the earlier date as a good sign that Ulta was preparing to share good news with inventors.
h3 Results/h3When Ulta Beauty reported, they blew past EPS (actual: $4.52, est: $2.57) and revenue expectations (actual: $1.967B, est: $1.765B), posting YoY growth of 519% and 60%, respectively.²³ Same Store Sales came in at 56.3% for the quarter.
This resulted in a price increase of 18.68 or +5%. Despite clear signs that make-up sales are recovering, early gains tapered off after Wells Fargo downgraded ULTA to equal weight, commenting that it was “difficult to envision upside” given the high price at which the stock currently trades.
¹ The DateBreaks Factor is a Wall Street Horizon proprietary measure, using a modified z-score protocol which looks at standard deviations from the norm and that captures the extent to which a confirmed earnings date deviates or breaks from historical trend (last 5 years) for the same quarter.
Negative means the earnings date is confirmed to be later than historical average while Positive is earlier.
² EPS and Revenue estimates provided by FactSet
³ Price change based on the highest or lowest point the stock reaches within the 3 days before and after reporting quarterly earnings results. Delta calculated from closing price.
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.