Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

U.S. House Rejects Trump’s Payroll Tax Deferral for Its Staff

Published 09/11/2020, 11:29 AM
Updated 09/11/2020, 12:00 PM
© Reuters.  U.S. House Rejects Trump’s Payroll Tax Deferral for Its Staff

(Bloomberg) -- The U.S. House of Representatives won’t implement President Donald Trump’s order allowing employers to defer payroll taxes owed by workers, joining major companies in rejecting the option.

The House “determined that implementing the deferral would not be in the best interests of the House or our employees,” Philip G. Kiko, the chamber’s chief administrative officer, said in an email to employees. “As a result, we will not implement the payroll tax deferral.”

Trump has been pushing employers to implement a directive that allows employers to forgo withholding payroll taxes due from Sept. 1 through the end of the year. Workers would need to pay back those levies next year unless Congress votes to forgive the bills. That could mean sharply higher withholding in early 2020.

Read more: Trump’s Stimulus End Run Fizzles as Firms Spurn Payroll Tax Halt

Few employers outside the federal government and the military have taken up the option, hobbling the intended effort to boost incomes and spending. Costco Wholesale Corp (NASDAQ:COST)., United Parcel Service Inc (NYSE:UPS). and FedEx Corp (NYSE:FDX). are among employers that have said they aren’t participating.

The Senate Human Resources Department didn’t immediately respond to a request about whether they would implement the deferral.

The deferral applies to those making less than $4,000 a week, which amounts to about $104,000 a year. House lawmakers wouldn’t qualify because they earn at least $174,000 annually.

©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

Latest comments

Foiled corruption attempt ??
Last time I checked $4k a week equaled $208k a year. common core math?
House lawmakers wouldn’t qualify because they earn at least $174,000 annually.why reject when they are not qualified?
Hi Tony. I interpreted as the House & it’s employees.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.