Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Oil Bears? Who Needs Them When You Have Russia’s Sechin?

Published 06/05/2019, 03:35 AM
Updated 09/02/2020, 02:05 AM

Forget oil bears on NYMEX and ICE. Meet a more potent one: Rosneft's (OTC:OJSCY) Igor Sechin.

The chief executive of Russia’s giant oil producer, which also happens to be the world’s largest publicly-traded petroleum company, could singularly do more damage to OPEC now than any crude short-seller in New York or London.

As the Saudis—who head the 14-member Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries—work quietly to convince the Russians to stay in their production cutting agreement for a third straight year, Sechin is demanding Moscow walk out or compensate his company.

Putin’s Powerful Ally Denounces OPEC Deal

That’s quite a dare against the government of one of the world’s most feared leaders: Vladimir Putin. But Sechin himself is a close ally of the Russian president, and is often described as his "de facto deputy”. He is in the inner circle of Putin's most conservative counselors and is leader of the Kremlin's Siloviki faction, a lobby gathering former security services agents. And Sechin has made it clear that he couldn’t care less about the fate of the other nine non-OPEC countries that Russia leads in its pact with the Saudis, the alliance collectively known as OPEC+10. His focus is all about protecting the interests of Mother Russia. To that extent, what he says resonates well with his government and country.

Said Sechin, according to Russia’s Interfax news service:

“Does it make sense (for Russia) to reduce (oil output) if the U.S immediately takes (our) market share? We have to defend our market share.”

U.S. crude exports, which had retreated in April after hitting a record high of 3.6 million barrels per day earlier in the year, had climbed again to around 3.3 million bpd two weeks ago, data showed. The Saudis have, meanwhile, been cutting production by record levels and pressuring an increasingly-reluctant Russia to do more export curbs.

Sechin wants all these to stop as he can see U.S. crude filling any vacuum left in the world by Rosneft and other Russian oil exporters. He could also not see any logic in Moscow agreeing to further cuts with the Saudis when Russian oil production was already at 3-year lows from a pipeline contamination crisis that resulted in just 10.87 million bpd being pumped June 1-3, from a May average of 11.11 million bpd.

This is not the first time Sechin has poured scorn on OPEC+10: he wrote to Putin in December to criticize the pact in a letter that was famously leaked.

Should he be rebuffed again, he wants Rosneft to be compensated for its losses in cutting production.

WTI 300-Min Chart - Powered by TradingView

To OPEC, demands from Rosneft's CEO could not come at a worse time. If his words gain traction in Moscow and Putin does hesitate in making another deal with the cartel, that could open up another rocky period for oil prices like in Q4 2018. Already, crude futures are at four-month lows, with West Texas Intermediate on New York’s NYMEX looking likely to crack the $50 per barrel support while global benchmark Brent teeters just above the $60 floor on ICE (NYSE:ICE). WTI lost 16% in May and Brent 11%. Losses amount to as much as 20% or more if observed from the highs of April, officially putting oil in bear-market territory.

To save the market from further collapse, the Saudis need the Russians.

Media reports quoting unnamed Russian sources have been circulating over the past two weeks that the OPEC and OPEC+10 meetings, originally scheduled in Vienna for June 25-26, were being moved to unconfirmed dates in July. The speculation was distressing enough for Saudi Energy Minister Khalid al-Falih to issue a strong but calmly-worded denial at the weekend through an Arab News interview that there will be no change in the dates. Yet, talk of a postponement has persisted, with Tehran officially feeding the rumor mill on Tuesday after Reuters cited a letter quoting Iranian Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh of indeed disagreeing to the original June meetings. If true, the Iranian decision wouldn’t be surprising given that the Saudis have been tacitly working with the U.S. to try and shut down Iranian oil exports under the Trump administration’s sanctions.

Trade War Worries Might Nullify Positive Impact Of Cuts

Even if the Saudis get another deal going with Russia, there’s no certainty that oil prices will rally as much as they did earlier this year, due to the trade wars the U.S. has with China and Mexico.

With summer in the northern hemisphere beginning in less than three weeks, strong refiner demand for gasoline has been surprisingly absent. Typically, fuel pumps in the U.S. will be reporting strong sales at this time of year as the U.S. driving season kicks into high gear. Crude oil inventories decreased by just 0.28 million barrels in the week to May 24, compared to a forecast draw of 0.86 million barrels. They rose by an average of 5 million barrels in the previous two weeks due to weak refinery runs. Preliminary figures for the week to May 31, issued by the American Petroleum Institute on Tuesday, suggest more bearish numbers, with a crude build of 3.6 million barrels.

Bloomberg opinion columnist Leonid Bershidsky, commenting on the Saudi-Russian pact back in December, said cutting production only made sense if big price increases could be sustained. While OPEC+10 cuts had produced nearly 40% in gains at their highs, now there were less than 20% of those left.

Added Bershidsky:

“Neither Saudi Arabia nor Russia are interested in cutting production so that the U.S. keeps increasing its own and becomes a competitor in global markets.”

Latest comments

Russian economy is much diversified than opec countries but staying with cuts means lot more than oil market stability.
Absolutely, Inderjeet. Both sides have much at stake here as I've said in the thread below.
Thank you, Barani!
I.Sechin is right, if SA wants Russia tu cut output - SA must pay Russia for the difference in production or gfo
Because breaking even does not make for a stable proletariat.
Barani, now we got it! Expect 59 and down soon, this week!
I didnt get you, buddy, what d you want to say actually?
Almost on cue. Just as we discussed, Rosneft rears their head. How brave does Sechin have to be to demand subsidies for not pumping oil they don’t have the capacity to pump with their ongoing contamination issues? I guess you talk like that when you’re the one in charge of the hit squad, eh? And thanks for clarifying my gross misinterpretation of Powell and Bullard’s commentary. After a reread I broadly missed the mark. Only Fed making sense is Evans, luckily he has a vote but it is seemingly in the minority. My commodity shorts are going red on me, but I hate to quit on a trend trade so early in the cycle. Wouldn’t be the first headfake to best my resolve. As always, excellent read Mr. Krishnan. And GOD help Al-Falih; the man needs all the blessings he can get. Having to hold emergency (public) private meetings with his key oil partner to no doubt offer willingness to be further extorted in exchange for their continued half-cooperation. What an incredibly raw deal! Have a good one sir
 Seriously is this humongous (I'm qualifying that adjective with the seasonal trend we've always had) build all to do with refiners disillusionment with margins that are about 30% lower? Granted, we also have new record in production at 12.4 mln bpd. That alone is 100k above from the previous week, meaning 700k in total extra supply for simple math.
I really can't say, sir. It puzzles me. One can balk at prices, but if they don't produce, I don't see how they can afford to sustain. Some market dynamic I'm not privy to, yet. Will keep digging and report back.
 You keep digging and when you get to the bottom of the ocean, you dig further to find a sweet spot to bury MBS in :)
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.